2/16/2024 0 Comments Tar xz compression levelIt's a two stage operation in the terminal too. tar.7z (as per the quote from the 7z man-page) because decompression/extraction becomes a 2-stage operation in the GUI. For example, if I'm compressing a folder containing some files to send to somebody, then I might use. It says so right there in the man-page for 7z:ħz is a great format and can provide compact archives, but I only use 7z on its own if I don't care about preserving file-permissions. 7z format does NOT preserve file-permissions (the owner and group permissions) for files. 7z on it's own for compressing backups on Linux. So no matter what compression algorithm you're using - the archive size may not be much smaller than the original files it contains.Īvoid using. certain video/audio files, data files, or other archive files) it may be impossible to compress those files much further. If you have a lot of files that are already in a compressed format (e.g. The other thing to bear in mind is that the amount of compression that is applied to an archive also depends on the type of files that you are compressing. The amount of time taken to compress/decompress will depend on things like: the algorithm used, the compression ratio, the available system resources of the computer performing the compression/decompression (memory, processor speed, the number of processor cores, number of other processes running etc) And from what I recall, your PC was fairly low-spec. Going back to 's post - if you are compressing large disk images of virtual machines - it's going to take a long time and potentially use up a lot of system resources to do so. It always used to be part of the p7zip package. At least there always used to be - I haven't used Arch in a good number of years though, so perhaps this situation has changed. Just switch to a terminal (I always have at least one running), two seconds of typing and BAM! Job done! Or at the very least, job running in the background whilst I get on with other things! XDĬlick to expand.Why are you running the Windows version through Wine? If you are running Arch - there should be a native Linux version of 7zFM available - if not in the repos - then in the AUR. I find it a lot more convenient to issue a quick one-liner, use a bash alias, or fire off a script (I write scripts for everything), than to clumsily fire up some GUI program, wait for it to load, point and click through a bunch of options, before starting whatever task I want to get done. I tend to use the terminal for most things. That said, I'm a bit of a terminal junkie. Both can handle all of the most common compression formats - as long as you have the appropriate tools installed for each file-type. I've never had a problem with either of them. But in my experience, both archive managers integrate well with the file managers in their respective Desktop Environments. Any that install a Gnome based system will typically use file-roller. Usually only the ones that install KDE/Plasma as the default desktop. However, some of the Arch-derived distros, which provide a fully configured Arch desktop system might supply Ark by default. Arch doesn't have a default archive manager, or a default desktop environment! After the initial installation - the graphical environment and all of the other software selections are completely up to the user to configure and install. But the Arch installer only gives you a basic terminal based environment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |